Ryan McDevitt

Date Approved


Embargo Period


Document Type


Degree Name

M.S. Engineering


Electrical and Computer Engineering


Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering


Jansson, Peter


Wind power--Evaluation


Electrical and Computer Engineering


A need exists for identification and evaluation of viable sites for wind energy. However, this is made difficult by the site-specific nature of the wind. A review of current industry practices shows that linear regression is the preferred method, although little work has been done to investigate alternative approaches. To address this, various methods were tested on 23 target sites with data measured over a long-term period. Each site was analyzed with the chosen best reference station, across 10 data periods for each method with results classified as mean absolute percentage error in energy density between the projected and measured results. Of primary concern was the comparative performance of these alternative methods to the current industry standard. The method that performed best was multiple regression analysis (MRA), which was 0.85% better than linear regression in absolute terms. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network (ANN) also exhibited promise in dealing with some of the non-linear aspects of the data sets, although its accuracy was found to be worse than linear regression by 0.79% in absolute terms. The affect of seasonality was also examined, showing extreme results in months of high and low wind speeds, but also results as close as 1.5% to the expected result when combining these extreme months to reach the expected mean wind speed.