Date of Presentation
5-5-2022 12:00 AM
College
School of Osteopathic Medicine
Poster Abstract
Background: Predictive factors for performing remplissage concomitantly with arthroscopic Bankart repair include the presence of humeral or glenoid defects >11% and/or revision surgery. International and societal consensus statements support these findings, as surgeons recommend the Latarjet procedure for patients with significant glenoid bone loss (>15-20%) while remplissage is recommended for patients with off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs lesions without significant glenoid bone loss. While several studies have compared outcomes between Latarjet surgery and remplissage, these studies have only evaluated patients with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, not consecutive patient cohorts indicated for each surgery.
Purpose: To compare rates of recurrent instability, re-operation, revision, and return to play (RTP), as well as patient-reported outcomes including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSI) between Latarjet surgery and arthroscopic labral repair plus remplissage surgery (Remplissage) patients.
Keywords
Bankart Lesions, Shoulder Joint, Shoulder Injuries, Surgical Procedures, Return to Sport
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences | Musculoskeletal Diseases | Orthopedics | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms | Sports Medicine | Surgery | Surgical Procedures, Operative
Document Type
Poster
Included in
Musculoskeletal Diseases Commons, Orthopedics Commons, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Commons, Sports Medicine Commons, Surgery Commons, Surgical Procedures, Operative Commons
Latarjet Surgery Leads to Decreased Rates of Subjective Instability Compared to Bankart Repair with Concomitant Remplissage
Background: Predictive factors for performing remplissage concomitantly with arthroscopic Bankart repair include the presence of humeral or glenoid defects >11% and/or revision surgery. International and societal consensus statements support these findings, as surgeons recommend the Latarjet procedure for patients with significant glenoid bone loss (>15-20%) while remplissage is recommended for patients with off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs lesions without significant glenoid bone loss. While several studies have compared outcomes between Latarjet surgery and remplissage, these studies have only evaluated patients with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, not consecutive patient cohorts indicated for each surgery.
Purpose: To compare rates of recurrent instability, re-operation, revision, and return to play (RTP), as well as patient-reported outcomes including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSI) between Latarjet surgery and arthroscopic labral repair plus remplissage surgery (Remplissage) patients.