Date of Presentation
5-2-2024 12:00 AM
College
Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine
Poster Abstract
Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are utilized as a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage heart failure. While LVAD implantation can significantly improve survival rates and quality of life, the procedure is not without risks, and postoperative complications are common. This review aims to investigate whether there is an association between living in a rural area and the incidence of postoperative complications or hospital readmissions following LVAD implantation, compared to urban LVAD recipients.
Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, examining studies that compared postoperative outcomes between rural and urban LVAD recipients. Data were extracted on adverse events, hospitalizations, and mortality rates, with a focus on the impact of geographic location on these outcomes.
Results: The review found that rural LVAD recipients may be at a higher risk for certain postoperative complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, ventricular arrhythmias, LVAD complications, and stroke. Rural patients also had higher instances of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Despite these challenges, survival rates and heart transplantation outcomes at 1 year were similar between rural and urban recipients. However, rural patients exhibited a higher driveline infection rate at 1 year.
Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that rural residency may be associated with an increased risk of certain postoperative complications and hospital readmissions following LVAD implantation. These results highlight the need for tailored healthcare strategies to address the unique challenges faced by rural LVAD recipients. Further research is necessary to fully understand the relationship between geographic location and LVAD outcomes, and to develop interventions that can improve postoperative care for this vulnerable population
Keywords
LVAD, Critical care, Ventricular assist device, Heart failure, Rural Health, Urban Health, Heart-Assist Devices, Postoperative Complications, Hospital Readmission, Rural Health Services
Disciplines
Cardiology | Cardiovascular Diseases | Health and Medical Administration | Health Services Administration | Health Services Research | Medicine and Health | Medicine and Health Sciences | Public Health | Surgical Procedures, Operative
Document Type
Poster
DOI
10.31986/issn.2689-0690_rdw.stratford_research_day.125_2024
Included in
Cardiology Commons, Cardiovascular Diseases Commons, Health and Medical Administration Commons, Health Services Administration Commons, Health Services Research Commons, Medicine and Health Commons, Surgical Procedures, Operative Commons
Is There an Association Between Living in a Rural Area and the Incidence of Postoperative Complications or Hospital Readmissions Following Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Implantation, Compared to Urban LVAD Recipients?
Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are utilized as a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage heart failure. While LVAD implantation can significantly improve survival rates and quality of life, the procedure is not without risks, and postoperative complications are common. This review aims to investigate whether there is an association between living in a rural area and the incidence of postoperative complications or hospital readmissions following LVAD implantation, compared to urban LVAD recipients.
Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, examining studies that compared postoperative outcomes between rural and urban LVAD recipients. Data were extracted on adverse events, hospitalizations, and mortality rates, with a focus on the impact of geographic location on these outcomes.
Results: The review found that rural LVAD recipients may be at a higher risk for certain postoperative complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, ventricular arrhythmias, LVAD complications, and stroke. Rural patients also had higher instances of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Despite these challenges, survival rates and heart transplantation outcomes at 1 year were similar between rural and urban recipients. However, rural patients exhibited a higher driveline infection rate at 1 year.
Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that rural residency may be associated with an increased risk of certain postoperative complications and hospital readmissions following LVAD implantation. These results highlight the need for tailored healthcare strategies to address the unique challenges faced by rural LVAD recipients. Further research is necessary to fully understand the relationship between geographic location and LVAD outcomes, and to develop interventions that can improve postoperative care for this vulnerable population