Faculty mentor/PI email address

pittonrissardo-jamir@cooperhealth.edu

Keywords

Wearable, technology, gait, balance, Parkinson's disease, movement disorders

Date of Presentation

5-6-2026 12:00 AM

Poster Abstract

Background: Wearable sensors and cue‑based technologies are increasingly used to augment rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the magnitude of benefit across clinical domains remains uncertain. Objective: This meta‑analysis aimed to quantify the effects of technology‑assisted interventions in PD. Methods: Randomized controlled trials evaluating wearable‑assisted interventions were systematically identified from PubMed. Outcomes included motor severity (Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III), balance (Berg Balance Scale, Mini‑BESTest, POMA balance), gait speed, walking endurance, freezing of gait (FOG‑Q/NFOG‑Q), fear of falling, and quality-of-life (PDQ‑39/PDQ‑8). Meta‑analyses were performed using random‑effects models to account for between‑study heterogeneity. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Results: Eight trials were identified, with seven included in quantitative analyses (experimental = 105; control = 103). Wearable‑based interventions resulted in greater improvement in motor severity (MD −2.16, 95% CI: −4.06 to −0.26; I2=0%) and balance (SMD 0.48, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.84; I2=18 %) compared with controls. No statistically significant differences were observed for gait speed (SMD 0.21, 95% CI: −0.11 to 0.52), gait endurance (SMD 0.54, 95% CI: −0.08 to 1.15), freezing of gait (SMD −0.24, 95% CI: −0.64 to 0.16), quality-of-life (SMD −0.29, 95% CI: −0.67 to 0.10), or fear of falling (SMD −0.16, 95% CI: −0.67 to 0.36).  Conclusion: Intervention duration ranged from 2 to 12 weeks. Wearable and technology‑assisted interventions provide mild but clinically meaningful improvements in motor function and balance in PD, with less consistent effects on gait, freezing, and patient‑reported outcomes.

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences | Nervous System Diseases | Other Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment

Share

COinS
 
May 6th, 12:00 AM

Wearable and Technology‑Assisted Gait and Balance Interventions in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis

Background: Wearable sensors and cue‑based technologies are increasingly used to augment rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the magnitude of benefit across clinical domains remains uncertain. Objective: This meta‑analysis aimed to quantify the effects of technology‑assisted interventions in PD. Methods: Randomized controlled trials evaluating wearable‑assisted interventions were systematically identified from PubMed. Outcomes included motor severity (Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III), balance (Berg Balance Scale, Mini‑BESTest, POMA balance), gait speed, walking endurance, freezing of gait (FOG‑Q/NFOG‑Q), fear of falling, and quality-of-life (PDQ‑39/PDQ‑8). Meta‑analyses were performed using random‑effects models to account for between‑study heterogeneity. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Results: Eight trials were identified, with seven included in quantitative analyses (experimental = 105; control = 103). Wearable‑based interventions resulted in greater improvement in motor severity (MD −2.16, 95% CI: −4.06 to −0.26; I2=0%) and balance (SMD 0.48, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.84; I2=18 %) compared with controls. No statistically significant differences were observed for gait speed (SMD 0.21, 95% CI: −0.11 to 0.52), gait endurance (SMD 0.54, 95% CI: −0.08 to 1.15), freezing of gait (SMD −0.24, 95% CI: −0.64 to 0.16), quality-of-life (SMD −0.29, 95% CI: −0.67 to 0.10), or fear of falling (SMD −0.16, 95% CI: −0.67 to 0.36).  Conclusion: Intervention duration ranged from 2 to 12 weeks. Wearable and technology‑assisted interventions provide mild but clinically meaningful improvements in motor function and balance in PD, with less consistent effects on gait, freezing, and patient‑reported outcomes.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.