"INTERROGATING WHITENESS IN EDUCATIONAL POLICY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF " by Erica Dawn Nekulak

Date Approved

1-8-2025

Embargo Period

2-5-2027

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)

Department

Educational Leadership

College

College of Education

Advisor

Ane Turner Johnson, PhD

Committee Member 1

Cecile Sam, PhD

Committee Member 2

David Lindenmuth, EdD

Keywords

Anti-blackness;Critical Policy Analysis;Document Analysis;Race Policy Analysis;School Improvement;Whiteness

Disciplines

Education Policy | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration | Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

School improvement (SI) policies provide an opportunity for educational equity. This critical policy analysis (CPA) (Diem & Young, 2015; Diem et al., 2014; Young & Diem, 2017; Young & Diem, 2018) investigated whiteness in school improvement policy documents within and across state and local levels. The study interrogated whiteness within school improvement policy using documents from the New York State Department of Education and New York City Public Schools. The overarching aim of this research was to name and disrupt whiteness, and thereby white supremacy, in school improvement policy by interrogating its presence within documents. This scholarship adds new insights to the critique of school accountability legislation by examining whiteness and racialized discourse practices within SI policy, a previously unexplored area. Analysis revealed how, through hierarchical structures, inequitable resource allocation, and cultural disregard, whiteness was reinforced and validated throughout SI policy documents. Additionally, coded language and deficit discourse pathologized and degraded racialized communities. SI policies failed to address the racial root causes of educational inequity or stratification. The narrative of SI policy reinforced a white supremacist regime that perpetuates traditional power dynamics.

Available for download on Friday, February 05, 2027

Share

COinS